Above page content

    Site map  Cookie policy


Trump administration moves to secure its legacy

As the transition to the Biden presidency gets underway, members of the current administration are ‘setting obstacles’ to ensure changes made in the Trump years can’t be easily reversed.

As the transition to the Biden presidency gets underway, members of the current administration are ‘setting obstacles’ to ensure changes made in the Trump years can’t be easily reversed.
Garry white employee

Garry White

in Features


Authorities in Beijing are getting ready to deal with a “final act of madness” from Donald Trump in the next few weeks. The defeated president is preparing “extreme measures” to secure his political legacy as the president that took on the cheating of China – and won.

China’s state-owned newspaper the Global Times, which often acts as the sharp-tongued propaganda arm of the country’s Communist Party, warned last week that the “staged hysteria” that had defined Mr Trump’s stint in the Oval Office was about to reach its crescendo.

The administration is preparing a multi-pronged attack on Beijing, the tabloid claimed, with plans to ratchet up tensions in several controversial and complex geopolitical clashes. As well as securing Mr Trump’s political legacy, China hawks believe they can “set obstacles” in the path of Joe Biden’s foreign-policy ambitions that will prevent him reversing any of Mr Trump’s perceived successes. But are these claims a true reflection of what is going on – or is China’s propaganda machine getting a bit too hysterical itself?

Rising China a priority

There is certainly evidence to suggest that moves are afoot in the world’s most powerful corridors. Last week, Washington launched yet another damaging attack on China’s technology sector, which it has accused of stealing ideas from American companies to gain an unfair advantage, particularly in 5G. President Trump signed an executive order that restricted US investors’ access to 31 Chinese companies that were designated by the Pentagon as “owned or controlled” by China’s military. These included some significant companies, including China Telecom and China Unicom.

China also warned that it will “strike back” against any moves that undermined its core interests, after comments by the US Secretary of State. In a highly-provocative move, Mike Pompeo denied that the Island of Taiwan was in any way part of China, provoking the Chinese foreign ministry into a declaration that the country will “strike back” against any moves that undermined its core national interests.

Mr Trump was previously a sharp critic of the use of executive orders, which can be issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and have the force of law. During the Obama years, the current president claimed the use of such orders was “an easy way out” and an example of weak leadership. It highlighted an inability to work with a democratically elected Congress, he argued.

Indeed, in 2016, Republicans established a task force to examine ways to “restore the proper balance of powers” from the president to Congress. However, President Trump has been extremely willing to sign these orders once he was handed the key to the Oval Office – and the issue is no longer high on the Republican Party’s agenda. Expect many more to be issued over the next few weeks focusing on four main areas.

Human rights now on agenda

American news agencies have been reporting a flurry of activity, as news of various potential policy actions leak out. As well as further moves to protect US intellectual property being used by China’s military, there could be action targeting illegal activity in other country’s territories by Chinese fishermen – and increased sanctions against Communist Party officials or institutions that are involved in the crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong. There is also likely to be action targeting the treatment of the country’s Uighur Muslims in the western regions, which will inflame tensions significantly as Beijing will regard it as interference in the country’s own internal affairs. 

This change of tone of the Trump administration regarding forced labour camps was first seen last month. A senior Trump official referred to China’s “re-education camps” as “concentration camps” for the first time.

Deputy White House national security adviser Matt Pottinger, a major influence on President Trump’s China policy, made the remarks in Mandarin. “There is no credible justification I can find in Chinese philosophy, religion, or moral law for the concentration camps inside your borders,” Mr Pottinger said in a statement directed at the Chinese people.

The human rights issue may be one of the so-called obstacles put in to hinder Mr Biden’s ambitions, as he has a strong record criticising Beijing over human rights – so is unlikely to row back from comments by the current Republican administration, however annoyed Beijing gets. Branding the facilities in Xinjiang “concentration camps” will make all of Washington’s interactions with China much more difficult in the future.

But what does this mean for investors?

Right now, the answer is not very much. Any actions are likely to accelerate trends that were already in place – such as adjusting supply chains to have less reliance on China – rather than send policy in a completely new direction. This is precisely what Donald Trump and his supporters now want to happen, of course. The centrepiece of the Trump years has been his targeting of the rise of China – and he is ensuring that, should Mr Biden emerge from current legal challenges as president-elect, he cannot ease the pressure on Beijing without being branded as weak.

Also, Mr Trump’s tough talk has failed to be backed up by firm action on several occasions in the past. Indeed, the Trump executive order last week contained caveats so US companies could get around any headline ban. Licenses to circumvent the restrictions are available – and the order stopped short of “blocking” the companies altogether. It also does not get implemented until 11 January and it still permits US-based investors to continue to own or sell shares they already hold in these companies. The main takeaway for investors is that relations between Washington and Beijing are unlikely to improve any time soon. In fact, they may get worse.

A version of this article first appeared in the Daily Telegraph.

Nothing on this website should be construed as personal advice based on your circumstances. No news or research item is a personal recommendation to deal.

Get in touch

Find out more

Our focus on clients has endured since the foundation of Charles Stanley in 1792 and has helped make us one of the UK's leading wealth management firms. Your interests give shape to everything we do.

Please call us to talk about your circumstances or complete the enquiry form.

020 3797 1783

Make an enquiry

If you have some questions we'd be happy to help.

Get in touch

Coronavirus (COVID-19)

Our latest information

Stay updated

Subscribe to our weekly email newsletter.

Subscribe here

Local Office

Your local office

Your local Charles Stanley office can help advise you on a wide range of investment management services.

Select an office


Newsletter banner signup